Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Objective The current objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-card Computer Version (WCST-64-CV) Failure to Maintain Set (FMS) as an embedded validity indicator. Methods Data were from an archival database of an academic medical center neuropsychology service. Three hundred sixty-eight adult participants completed the WCST-64-CV and Word Memory Test (WMT). Participants were defined as noncredible if all three of their WMT Immediate Recall (IR), Delayed Recall (DR), and Consistency (CNS) scores were 82.5% or below. Participants were defined as credible if all three of IR, DR, and CNS scores were above 82.5%. Forty-seven participants with scores both above and at/below 82.5% were excluded (N = 321). The sample was mean age 45 years (standard deviation SD = 17), mean education 13 years (SD = 2), 50% female, and 77% Caucasian. Primary diagnoses were 56.8% epilepsy and 18.1% mild cognitive impairment. No participants had dementia or an acute stroke. Results Twenty-eight participants were noncredible (8.7%) and 293 were credible (91.3%). One hundred sixty-five participants got 0 FMS (51.4%), 95 participants got 1 (29.6%), 41 participants got 2 (12.8%), and 20 participants got 3 or more (6.2%). The lowest cut-off that achieved at least 90% specificity was failure defined as ≥3. The specificity was 93.5% and the sensitivity was 3.5%. A cut-off of ≥2 achieved 80.8% specificity and 17.8% sensitivity. A cut-off of ≥1 achieved 50.8% specificity and 42.8% sensitivity. Conclusions There is no cut-off of WCST-64-CV FMS that achieves adequate specificity and sensitivity as an embedded validity indicator in this mixed clinical sample.
Cation et al. (Thu,) studied this question.