Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract It is a good thing to resolve disputes. Yet arbitration is perceived as being contrary to the right to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Indeed, the current approach of the courts is to say that an agreement to arbitrate is a waiver of the right to a fair trial. That is factually incorrect and alarming in principle. This article investigates the problem and proposes a new approach. The end result confirms the legitimacy of arbitration and improves our understanding around the independence of arbitrators and the confidentiality of proceedings.
Nathan Tamblyn (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: