September 1, 2024

The future of large language models in social science research: Reply to Berger (2024) and Carrillo et al. (2024).

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

In their commentaries, Berger (2024) and Carrillo et al. (2024) raise several thoughtful questions regarding machine-assisted hypothesis generation in the social sciences. We discuss their ideas and build upon them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Banker et al. (Sun,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59fabb6db64358753a250 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001287

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A workflow for human-centered machine-assisted hypothesis generation: Commentary on Banker et al. (2024).2024 · 7 citations
2Machines, psychology, and hypothesis generation: Commentary on Banker et al. (2024).2024 · 3 citations
3Machine-assisted social psychology hypothesis generation.2024 · 24 citations
4The ‘Implicit Intelligence’ of artificial intelligence. Investigating the potential of large language models in social science research2024 · 2 citations
5Voices from the algorithm: Large language models in social research2024 · 5 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar