July 30, 2024Open Access

The is-ought problem in deciding what to replicate: which motives guide current replication practices?

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

This is a comment on the article Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size by Isager, van ‘t Veer, and Lakens that is to appear in Meta-Psychology (https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/knjea).

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Kamermans et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5e80fb6db64358757d10a https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6xdy2

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science2018 · 147 citations
2What To Replicate? Justifications Of Study Choice From 85 Replication Studies.2018 · 9 citations
3Reflections on the replication corner: In praise of conceptual replications2015 · 116 citations
4Replications in Psychology Research2012 · 783 citations
5Publication Biases in Replication Studies2020 · 18 citations

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo