Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The article is devoted to defining the features of the meaningful evolution of the human right to peace, as well as the prospects for its provision in the context of today’s crisis raealities. It is emphasized that modern international legal institutions have demonstrated their inability to adequately guarantee interstate peace and security, and the existing sanctions policy has not justified itself, because, as the example of the Russian-Ukrainian war shows, the aggressor has found ways to circumvent it. In this regard, attention is focused on the importance of developing the International Sanctions Code in order to establish such “rules of the game” that the aggressor will not have the opportunity to use military means to resolve relevant international and other conflicts. The opinion is substantiated that one of the most important prerequisites for ensuring the effective practical implementation of the right to peace is a “healthy” moral environment of human life and society, which can be achieved under the condition of appropriate “normotactics” or an appropriate level of coherence and interconnection between social regulators, primarily law, morality and religion. It is concluded that ensuring and protecting the human right to peace requires the creation of appropriate conditions in society aimed at establishing a state of harmony, coherence, accord, unity, and consensus among legal entities at all levels.
Skrypniuk et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: