Persistent disparities in insulin pump uptake despite a universal pump programme for type 1 diabetes in Ontario, Canada

Abstract Aim To evaluate associations between social disadvantage and insulin pump use among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the context of a universal publicly funded insulin pump programme in Ontario, Canada, and to ascertain whether social disparities in insulin pump programme enrolment have decreased over time. Methods Population‐based cross‐sectional studies were conducted using administrative healthcare data in Ontario, Canada. First, among adults aged older than 18 years diagnosed with T1D before 31 March 2021, logistic regression was used to assess the association between neighbourhood social disadvantage (Ontario marginalization index quintiles) and insulin pump use. Second, among all paediatric and adult applicants to the insulin pump programme from 1 September 2006 to 31 March 2022, ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between year of insulin pump initiation and social disadvantage. Results Among 27 453 adults with T1D, 60% used insulin pumps. Greater social disadvantage was associated with lower odds of insulin pump use (adjusted odds ratio OR 0. 44 95% confidence interval CI 0. 39‐0. 48 for greatest vs. lowest social disadvantage quintile). Among 21 002 paediatric and adult applicants to the insulin pump programme, social disparities in pump use decreased in the first 3 years of the programme, plateaued until 2020, then increased from 2020 to 2022, with no change in the odds of being in a higher social deprivation quintile for 2022 relative to 2007 (OR 1. 09 95% CI 0. 83‐1. 44). Conclusions Despite a universal pump programme for individuals with T1D, disparities by social disadvantage persist. Residual financial and non‐financial barriers must be addressed to promote equitable insulin pump uptake.