Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant astrocytomas central nervous system World Health Organization grade 2 and 3 show heterogeneous appearance on MRI. In the premolecular era, the discrepancy between T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense tumor volume in absolute values has been proposed as a marker for diffuse tumor growth. We set out to investigate if a ratio of T1 to T2 tumor volume (T1/T2 ratio) is associated with resectability and overall survival (OS) in patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas. METHODS: Patient data from 2 centers (Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Center A; LMU University Hospital, Center B) were collected retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were as follows: pre and postoperative MRI scans available for volumetric analysis (I), diagnosis of an IDH-mutant astrocytoma between 2003 and 2021 (II), and tumor resection at initial diagnosis (III). Tumor volumes were manually segmented. The T1/T2 ratio was calculated and correlated with extent of resection, residual T2 tumor volume, and OS. RESULTS: The study comprised 134 patients with 65 patients included from Center A and 69 patients from Center B. The median OS was 134 months and did not differ between the cohorts ( P = .29). Overall, the median T1/T2 ratio was 0.79 (range 0.15-1.0). Tumors displaying a T1/T2 ratio of 0.33 or lower showed significantly larger residual tumor volumes postoperatively (median 17.9 cm 3 vs 4.6 cm 3 , P = .03). The median extent of resection in these patients was 65% vs 90% ( P = .03). The ratio itself did not correlate with OS. In multivariable analyses, larger postoperative tumor volumes were associated with shorter survival times (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, P < .01). CONCLUSION: The T1/T2 ratio might be a good indicator for diffuse tumor growth on MRI and is associated with resectability in patients with IDH-mutant astrocytoma. This ratio might aid to identify patients in which an oncologically relevant tumor volume reduction cannot be safely achieved.
Weller et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: