Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract BACKGROUND While there has been an international call to increase access to pediatric oncology clinical trials, the current landscape of global clinical trials for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors has not been described. We sought to analyze the availability of clinical trials available for children with CNS tumors worldwide. METHODS Clinical trials were included if they were interventional studies registered in International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) that included pediatric patients (≤17 years old) with a CNS tumor. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to identify peer-reviewed manuscripts describing the results of identified trials. RESULTS From 114,414 oncology trials, 322 studies met inclusion criteria. Geographically, 307 (95%) studies were sponsored by and conducted in high-income countries (HICs), while 15 studies (4.7%) were sponsored by and conducted in middle-income countries (MICs). No studies were registered in or accrued from low-income countries. Studies were mostly sponsored in the United States (244, 76%), United Kingdom (20, 6.2%), or France (13, 4.0%). Trials were mostly sponsored by individual institutions (168, 52%), followed by governmental organizations (100, 31%), collaborative groups (36, 11%) and pharmaceutical companies (18, 5.5%). Study characteristics differed with income status, with HICs registering mostly clinical trials for cancer-directed treatment (261, 85%) and MICs registering later phase supportive care-based or diagnostic trials (9, 60%). Of the studies included, 132 (43%) were published. There were similar rates of publishing results in HIC and MICs. Discussion: Low- and middle-income countries are under-represented in the global clinical research landscape of pediatric CNS tumors. Furthermore, these data describe the urgent needs to invest in clinical research infrastructure in LMICs and to foster collaborations that include LMICs as a critical step in achieving equity in global pediatric cancer care.
Mikkelsen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: