Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
e15173 Background: NGS based mutational findings are increasingly used in oncology practice to personalize treatment strategies. We elucidate the impact of comprehensive genomic profiling and the new avenues it opens for personalized precision medicine. Methods: This was a retrospective study evaluating patients who underwent a cost-effective (10) were reported in 0.5% and 7.4% respectively. PDL1 positive IHC was reported in 3.2% of tissue samples, whereas HRD high (>50) was reported in 2.3% of the cohort of which the majority (11.5%) were from Upper GI tumors. Targetable genomic alterations were detected in 53.8% (181/336) of which 38.1%(69/181) received the suggested targeted therapy. Clinical response was seen as PR in 14.4% and CR in 2.8% of patients. Of 336 patients 4.76% received modified therapeutic regimens which differed from the standard of care, wherein median PFS was 8 mo CI 95% (5.3-10.7) while median OS was 55.1 mo CI 95% (25.8-NA). Conclusions: This observational study outlines the potential benefit of personalizing treatment regimens in the management of solid organ cancers, especially in scenarios where standard-of-care regimens may have failed and the need to incorporate broad-spectrum NGS. Table: see text
Maheshwari et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: