Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Designing Reinforcement Learning (RL) solutions for real-life problems remains a significant challenge. A major area of concern is safety. "Shielding" is a popular technique to enforce safety in RL by turning user-defined safety specifications into safe agent behavior. However, these methods either suffer from extreme learning delays, demand extensive human effort in designing models and safe domains in the problem, or require pre-computation. In this paper, we propose a new permissibility-based framework to deal with safety and shield construction. Permissibility was originally designed for eliminating (non-permissible) actions that will not lead to an optimal solution to improve RL training efficiency. This paper shows that safety can be naturally incorporated into this framework, i.e. extending permissibility to include safety, and thereby we can achieve both safety and improved efficiency. Experimental evaluation using three standard RL applications shows the effectiveness of the approach.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alexander Politowicz
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sahisnu Mazumder
Intel (United States)
Bing Liu
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Politowicz et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67f72b6db6435876091c8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.19414
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: