Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
In this article, the authors considered the phenomenon of algorithmization of the process of generating solutions by artificial intelligence and the resulting problems of implementing the idea of “digital justice”, such as hallucinations of artificial intelligence and the inherent absence of a vector for the implementation of “digital justice” when evaluating evidence, exercising judicial discretion and applying evaluation categories. The paper also provides a comparative analysis of experimental projects for the introduction and development of digital justice in different countries in recent years.
Кулаков et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: