Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract: This essay appraises Michael W. Clune’s arguments for the importance of literary judgment. It mainly supports Clune’s case but argues that judgment in fact goes deeper and extends further than Clune recognizes.
Simon During (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: