May 15, 2024Open Access

AI Regulation Paradigms and the Struggle over Control Rights

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Who has the power to shape AI systems, and for whose benefit? Scott Timcke explores regulatory paradigms of AI control rights in China, the EU, and the US, and problematizes the exclusion of the Global South from shaping these evolving paradigms.

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Scott Timcke (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6a135b6db6435876248d0 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21428/bfcb0bff.ae40312a

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1AI as a Human Right in an Era of Extreme Concentration2026
2Triadic Contest: The US, China, EU, and the Battle for the Soul of AI2026
3How to respond to the challenges of artificial intelligence: A comparative analysis of regulatory approaches of the European Union, China, and the United States2026
4The Innovation-Regulation Trade-off: Navigating Rapid Artificial Intelligence Advancements Within Evolving Compliance Boundaries2026
5Competing ambitions regarding the global governance of artificial intelligence: China, the <scp>US</scp>, and the <scp>EU</scp>2024 · 9 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo