Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) complexity is assessed using the SYNTAX score. High scores may reflect complex LM lesions or multivessel disease. Evidence on the prognosis of these distinct populations is scarce. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected LMCAD were categorized into four groups based on LM lesion location (Body/Ostial vs. Bifurcation) and non-LM SYNTAX score (≤8 vs. >8). The reference group was Body/Ostial cases with low non-LM score. The primary endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year. Out of 869 patients undergoing LM PCI, 69.2% had a LM bifurcation lesion, and 44.8% non-LM SYNTAX score >8. Patients with bifurcation lesions were older, had higher rates of chronic kidney disease, and received more stents. Conversely, those with high non-LM score (>8) were more likely to present with congestive heart failure or low ejection fraction. After adjustment, both groups with LM bifurcation disease had higher rates of 1-year MACE, driven by TVR. In contrast, there was no difference between the Body/Ostial lesion with high non-LM score group and the reference group (Table). In patients post LM PCI, bifurcation lesion location is associated with higher incidence of MACE, regardless of non-LM SYNTAX score. This association was not evident in cases with Body/Ostial lesions and significant non-LM disease.
Roumeliotis et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: