Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Aim A minimally invasive approach (MIS) to complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) is expanding and offers advantages in enhanced recovery. We report our single-centre experience in the introduction of Robotic CAWR. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was carried out from March 2023 to January 2024. All patients undergoing CAWR using a MIS approach were included. Data was collected for the following: sex, age (years), BMI (kg/m2), length of hospital stay (LOS, days), operative time (hours), and post-operative complications. Results 30 patients underwent MIS CAWR (22 robotic; 8 laparoscopic). Male to female ratio was 18:12. The median age was 59 years (IQR 47–66) and BMI 36 kg/m2 (IQR 32–37). Operations included eTEP retro-rectus Rives-Stoppa (RS) + diastasis plication +/- TAR repair using macroporous polypropylene non-absorbable synthetic mesh. Three patients (10%) had TAR and another 3 (10%) had simultaneous inguinal hernia repairs. The median operating time for RS was 3.3 hours (IQR 3.1–3.5) whilst 7.5 hours (IQR 7.2–7.8) for RS + TAR. The median LOS was 2 days (IQR 1–2). Seven (23%) patients developed post-operative urinary retention requiring catheterization. 1 (3%) patient developed a post-operative chest infection. Twenty-two of 27 (82%) patients undergoing MIS Rives Stoppa required oral post-operative analgesia only. 1 (3%) patient had laparoscopic converted to open procedure due to bowel involvement. Conclusion MIS/Robotic CAWR is a safe approach and can be performed in a similar length of time to open procedures. However, LOS is significantly reduced and patients can be successfully managed with oral analgesia.
Sharma et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: