Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This study delves into the practical obstacles experienced by high school Korean language teachers during the process of paper-and-pencil testing, specifically focus ing on a content analysis of their reflective essays. Analyzing the paper-and-pencil testing process entailed a mix of deductive and inductive methodologies, divided into three stages: (a) individual item creation by teachers, (b) (joint) review of the de signed items, and (c) approval of the completed items. The findings of the study are as follows: difficulties in crafting original items; psychological resistance toward plain and simple items; psychological resistance toward college entrance exam-ori ented items; concerns regarding multiple and incorrect answers; difficulties with revising items in terms of ensuring completeness; diversity interpretations of what constitutes effective items; weakened sense of ownership over items; reluctance to accept others' feedback; burden of reiterating revised items; shifts in the focus of test design; consideration given to introducing new assessment systems or policies; increased possibility of errors due to late item replacements; dissatisfaction with the decision-making process, often involving a small number of people; and poten tial for item replacement due to the emergence of new social issues.
Sungmin Chang (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: