Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Non-invasive II (PD30)1 May 2024PD30-10 UROMONITOR®: CLINICAL VALIDATION AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF A URINARY BIOMARKER FOR RECURRENCE SURVEILLANCE IN NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER PATIENTS Pedro Ramos, João Paulo-Brás, Carolina Dias, Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves, Francisco Botelho, João Silva, Carlos Martins-Silva, and Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo Pedro RamosPedro Ramos , João Paulo-BrásJoão Paulo-Brás , Carolina DiasCarolina Dias , Mafalda Bessa-GonçalvesMafalda Bessa-Gonçalves , Francisco BotelhoFrancisco Botelho , João SilvaJoão Silva , Carlos Martins-SilvaCarlos Martins-Silva , and Luís Pacheco-FigueiredoLuís Pacheco-Figueiredo View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008848.77629.6f.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Bladder cancer (BC) remains the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, with non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) representing the vast majority of bladder cancer patients. The current standard of care (SOC) follow-up in NMIBC patients demands an intensive schedule and requires costly and burdensome methods, driving the development of alternative, non-invasive, cost-effective methods that may complement or serve as substitutes to cystoscopy and cytology. Uromonitor® is a urine biomarker test that detects hotspot mutations in three genes (TERT, FGFR3, and KRAS) for the evaluation of disease recurrence. The aim of the current study was to assess its performance comparing it to the current SOC methods. METHODS: A total of 528 NMIBC surveillances from 439 individual patients were enrolled from December 2021 to June 2023. All subjects underwent SOC methods and provided an urine sample before undergoing cystoscopy for Uromonitor® analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for recurrence and compared to the gold-standard cystoscopy plus trans-urethral resection (TURBT) pathology. RESULTS: Uromonitor® displayed a sensitivity of 87.2%, with only 6 recurrences failing to be detected by the urinary biomarker test, a specificity of 99.2%, a PPV of 93.2% and a NPV of 98.8%. Cystoscopy showed a total of 22 (31,88%) false positives not confirmed by TURBT, while Uromonitor® presented only 3 positive tests where no suspected lesions were found in cystoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity and NPV values for Uromonitor® also remained high across all NMIBC grades and stages. CONCLUSIONS: In the present trial, we confirmed that the Uromonitor® biomarker test represents a reliable tool in the detection of NMIBC recurrence in patients undergoing routine surveillance, regardless of stage and grade. It offers either an alternative or a complement to the current SOC methods, providing rapid results and a non-invasive option, potentially improving patients' quality of life and helping reduce the economic burden of NMIBC follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study assessing Uromonitor®´s performance and thus validating its usefulness in clinical practice. Download PPT Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e628 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Pedro Ramos More articles by this author João Paulo-Brás More articles by this author Carolina Dias More articles by this author Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves More articles by this author Francisco Botelho More articles by this author João Silva More articles by this author Carlos Martins-Silva More articles by this author Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Ramos et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: