Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology p=0.043). Even at the lowest fluoroscopy settings, the average radiation used was significantly higher when using the conventional needle compared to the laser-guided needle (1.5 vs 0.81 mGy; p=0.04). Access was rated to be significantly easier using the laser-guided technique vs the conventional needle (4.6 vs 6.6/10; p=0.021). 80% of participants preferred the laser-guided technique to establish renal access. CONCLUSIONS: Although challenging, pulsed low dose fluoroscopy can be used for establishing renal access during PCNL. Addition of a specialized laser-guided needle further reduces fluoroscopy time and simplifies the procedure. Download PPT Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e1181 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Tyler Humphries More articles by this author Ala'a Farkouh More articles by this author Matthew Buell More articles by this author Akin S. Amasyali More articles by this author Rose Leu More articles by this author Kanha Shete More articles by this author Katya Hanessian More articles by this author Sikai Song More articles by this author Kai Wen Cheng More articles by this author Evan Seibly More articles by this author Zhamshid Okhunov More articles by this author D. Duane Baldwin More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Humphries et al. (Mon,) studied this question.