Mp73-20 Where to Start Your Nerve-Sparing in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Lateral Prostatic Fascia Versus Prostatic Pedicle

You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology p=0.011 for gestures). The 1-year EF recovery rate was 43% for the lateral prostatic fascia approach and 46% for the prostatic pedicle approach (p=0.83, Chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: The lateral prostatic fascia approach was more efficient in identifying the anatomic NS dissection plane compared to the prostatic pedicle approach, while EF recovery at 1 year was similar. More exposure to lateral prostatic fascia approach may benefit training surgeons. Download PPT Source of Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01CA273031. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e1190 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Runzhuo Ma More articles by this author Eman Dadashian More articles by this author Alvin C. Goh More articles by this author Geoffrey A. Sonn More articles by this author Christian Wagner More articles by this author Andrew J. Vickers More articles by this author Jim C. Hu More articles by this author Andrew Hung More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...