Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Background/Aim: Top prospective clinical trials comparing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy plus chemotherapy for wild-type Ras proto-oncogene, GTPase (WT RAS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have yielded different outcomes, and real-world data are lacking. This study established real-world experiences and identified challenges in treating patients with mCRC. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study identified first-line regimens for patients with mCRC on anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF therapy plus chemotherapy. The effects on overall survival (OS) were estimated; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS). OS in the two groups was compared on the basis of sex, age, primary tumor site, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and number of organs with metastases through Cox multivariate regression analysis. Results: A total of 129 patients diagnosed with WT RAS mCRC from June 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, were included. The median OS was 33.3 months for the anti-EGFR group (n = 78) and 26.1 months for the anti-VEGF group (n = 51; 95% confidence interval = 1.008–2.550; p = 0.044). PFS was 17.6 and 12 months, respectively (95% confidence interval = 0.9-1.963; p = 0.15). Multivariate Cox regression models revealed good OS for patients with WT RAS and left-sided primary tumor. The liver-only metastasis conversion rate after systemic chemotherapy was higher in the anti-EGFR group. Conclusion: High survival rates can be achieved when anti-EGFR is used in patients with WT RAS mCRC. Surgery still plays an important role in patients with mCRC and on systemic treatments.
Chiang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: