Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The aim of the present article is to examine how the debate is constituted in the context of a Platonic dialogue, in order to approach a virtue -in this case, the virtue of temperance-ontologically and epistemologically and to specialize its general definition in terms of how it is presented to a particular person.Our reflections are structured in two subchapters, in which the analytical method meets the method of synthetic judgments.In terms of content, we would note that, focusing on passage 158e-160d, we attempt a systematic reading of the virtue of temperance and, at the same time, we examine the origins of Socrates' interrogative method with a view to the speculative construction of its definition.It is worth noting that the passage we examine is crucial from a methodological point of view, as it reveals the terms on which the Socratic dialectic works.
Térézis et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: