Coral restoration can drive rapid reef carbonate budget recovery

Restoration is increasingly seen as a necessary tool to reverse ecological decline across terrestrial and marine ecosystems.1Gann G.D. McDonald T. Walder B. Aronson J. Nelson C.R. Jonson J. Hallett J.G. Eisenberg C. Guariguata M.R. Liu J. et al.International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration.Restor. Ecol. 2019; 27 (Second edition): S1-S46https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035Crossref Scopus (750) Google Scholar,2Duarte C.M. Agusti S. Barbier E. Britten G.L. Castilla J.C. Gattuso J.-P. Fulweiler R.W. Hughes T.P. Knowlton N. Lovelock C.E. et al.Rebuilding marine life.Nature. 2020; 580: 39-51Crossref PubMed Scopus (490) Google Scholar Considering the unprecedented loss of coral cover and associated reef ecosystem services, active coral restoration is gaining traction in local management strategies and has recently seen major increases in scale. However, the extent to which coral restoration may restore key reef functions is poorly understood.3Boström-Einarsson L. Babcock R.C. Bayraktarov E. Ceccarelli D. Cook N. Ferse S.C.A. Hancock B. Harrison P. Hein M. Shaver E. et al.Coral restoration–A systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions.PLoS One. 2020; 15e0226631Crossref Scopus (278) Google Scholar,4Hein M.Y. Vardi T. Shaver E.C. Pioch S. Boström-Einarsson L. Ahmed M. Grimsditch G. McLeod I.M. Perspectives on the use of coral reef restoration as a strategy to support and improve reef ecosystem services.Front. Mar. Sci. 2021; 8: 299Crossref Scopus (34) Google Scholar Carbonate budgets, defined as the balance between calcium carbonate production and erosion, influence a reef's ability to provide important geo-ecological functions including structural complexity, reef framework production, and vertical accretion.5Perry C.T. Alvarez-Filip L. Changing geo-ecological functions of coral reefs in the Anthropocene.Funct. Ecol. 2019; 33: 976-988Crossref Scopus (115) Google Scholar Here we present the first assessment of reef carbonate budget trajectories at restoration sites. The study was conducted at one of the world's largest coral restoration programs, which transplants healthy coral fragments onto hexagonal metal frames to consolidate degraded rubble fields.6Smith D.J. Mars F. Williams S. Van Oostrum J. Mcardle A. Rapi S. Jompa J. Janetski N. Indonesia: mars assisted reef restoration system.in: Vaughan D. Active Coral Restoration: Techniques for a Changing Planet. J. Ross Publishing), 2021: 463-482Google Scholar Within 4 years, fast coral growth supports a rapid recovery of coral cover (from 17% ± 2% to 56% ± 4%), substrate rugosity (from 1.3 ± 0.1 to 1.7 ± 0.1) and carbonate production (from 7.2 ± 1.6 to 20.7 ± 2.2 kg m−2 yr−1). Four years after coral transplantation, net carbonate budgets have tripled and are indistinguishable from healthy control sites (19.1 ± 3.1 and 18.7 ± 2.2 kg m−2 yr−1, respectively). However, taxa-level contributions to carbonate production differ between restored and healthy reefs due to the preferential use of branching corals for transplantation. While longer observation times are necessary to observe any self-organization ability of restored reefs (natural recruitment, resilience to thermal stress), we demonstrate the potential of large-scale, well-managed coral restoration projects to recover important ecosystem functions within only 4 years.