Are There Any Advantages of the Low Opioid Anaesthesia and Non-Opioid Postoperative Analgesia Protocol: A Clinical Observational Study

Purpose:The methods of perioperative analgesia and pain control have changed.The principle of opioid-based analgesia has been modified to multimodal analgesia, followed by LOA (low opioid anaesthesia) and OFA (opioid-free anaesthesia).The aim was to describe the effects of LOA on nausea, vomiting, and pain control during general anaesthesia and postoperative period after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods:The protocol included the study group-40 patients received low-opioid anaesthesia (LOA), and the control group-40 patients received general anaesthesia with opioid analgesia (OA).The scheme of LOA was based on ketamine, lidocaine, magnesium sulfate, paracetamol, and metamizole.The OA was based on standard opioid (fentanyl) administration in induction and maintenance phase due to clinical observation.Postoperative analgesia included 1g of paracetamol and 1g of metamizol intravenously, with a 6-hour interval between doses.Results: Significant differences in the pain score in the periods of 2-6, 6-12, and 12-24 hours after anaesthesia between the groups were noticed (p < 0.001).Moreover, a significant difference in the frequency of nausea (p = 0.005) and vomiting (p = 0.04) between groups were presented.Nausea occurred in 54.05% of OA group, while in the LOA group, it occurred in a 23.08%.Vomiting occurred in 32.43% of control group, while in the study group, it occurred in 12.82% of patients. Conclusion:The LOA protocol was more beneficial in reducing nausea and vomiting than the opioid-based method of anaesthesia.The LOA protocol of general anaesthesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and non-opioid postoperative analgesia have better outcomes in pain control, as well as nausea and vomiting, and improve postoperative patient comfort.The LOA protocol during anaesthesia and non-opioid postoperative analgesia should be considered in routine practice.