Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The ability to identify speech at worse signal-to-noise ratios when the maskers are spatially separated compared to when they are colocated is called spatial release from masking (SRM) and is thought to be a combination of monaural and binaural advantages arising from spatially separating the target from the maskers. Also, a host of other cognitive skills including attention, working memory, and executive function that support listeners’ ability to segregate, track and attend to a “target” signal while tuning out other unwanted signals contributes to understanding speech better in complex environments. Previous research with young normal hearing listeners from our lab indicated that SRM was predicted by an individual’s ability to use binaural cues (ITD thresholds), switch attention between two streams of information (trail making test) and ability to suppress irrelevant information (flanker task). Here, we present data from older listeners with varying hearing abilities on acoustic (envITD sensitivity) and non-acoustic tasks measuring attention (auditory and visual single and dual task), processing (trail making task), executive control (flanker task) and speech in noise tests (spatial release from masking using coordinate Response Measure sentences). The relationship between these acoustic and non-acoustic factors to speech understanding in complex listening environments will be discussed.
Barkhouse et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: