Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This paper endogenizes the decision whether to post a mechanism or to participate in another trader's mechanism in a competing mechanisms environment. With a population of heterogeneous buyers and sellers facing standard search frictions, each trader in our market has to decide whether to post a mechanism or to visit a mechanism posted by a trader on the other side of the market. We show that the equilibrium in this market is unique and is constrained efficient. Inefficient traders (low-value buyers and high-cost sellers) choose to visit with probability one, while more efficient traders randomize between posting and visiting. The resulting allocation differs substantially from the equilibrium allocation in the market where only one side can post mechanisms, especially when trader heterogeneity is significant. This suggests that decentralized marketplaces should allow participating buyers and sellers to self-select into making or receiving offers. We also provide conditions under which posting decisions are monotone, so that more efficient types post with higher probabilities than less efficient types.
Severinov et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: