Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The article is devoted to the conflict of laws provisions of the Russian legislation regulating the form of a state contract for the performance of contractual works for the needs of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs system. In the course of the analysis the author comes to the conclusion that, in general, the oral form of the transaction is inapplicable to the said state contract, but only can be an exception in connection with certain life circumstances (legal facts) established in regulatory legal acts. At the same time, the use of the electronic form of the state contract in modern times prevails over the written and oral forms of transactions. The development of social relations in the field of digitalization is the main determinant factor in the allocation and legislative consolidation of the third form of transactions — electronic, which has its own specific and unique characteristics.
Rustam R. Abdullaev (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: