Pulse nav.journalClub Debates activos Tendencias Explorar Investigadores

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

Inicio Explorar nav.journalClub Tendencias

⌘+K

© Synapse Social LLC, 2026

Política de privacidad

Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality | Synapse

February 26, 2024Open Access

Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Researchers would be more willing to prioritize research quality over quantity if the incentive structure of the academic system aligned with this goal. The winner of a 2023 Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research explains how they rose to this challenge.

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Gärtner et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e777acb6db6435876eca42 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002553

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, <i>h</i> -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia2019 · 136 citations
2Ten steps toward a better personality science – how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation2021 · 12 citations
3Questionable research practices among researchers in the most research‐productive management programs2022 · 50 citations
4Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank2013 · 454 citations
5Where Are the Self-Correcting Mechanisms in Science?2021 · 62 citations