Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
China has the largest number of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the world, but current levels of diagnosis and treatment are low. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of various universal HCV screening and treatment strategies in China and inform decisions on health policy. A cost-effectiveness analytical study. We developed a Markov model to investigate cost-effectiveness of different HCV screening and treatment strategies in China. We simulated several screening scenarios for Chinese people aged 18–70 years. We estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of different intervention scenarios compared with status quo. Expanded HCV screening and treatment strategy with prioritisation for high-risk groups (Scenario S5) was the most cost-effective strategy (ICER: USD 11, 667. 71/quality-adjusted life-year QALY gained), which resulted in great reduction in HCV-related diseases and deaths, with a 67. 11% reduction in cases of chronic HCV. Universal HCV screening and treatment implementation remains a cost-effective strategy when delayed until 2025 (ICER: USD 17, 093. 69/QALY), yet the delayed strategy is less effective in reducing HCV-related deaths. Expanded HCV screening and treatment strategy with prioritisation for high-risk groups is the most cost-effective strategy and has lead to a significant reduction in both HCV morbidity and mortality in China, which would essentially eliminate HCV as a public threat.
Fang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: