Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
There is a clear instrumentalization of the theme of social housing (SH) as a “false problem” that justifies various urban and housing incentives for real estate market production. This is produced, but is inaccessible to those who need housing, a “fake SH”. In the article, after the introduction – where we problematize the incentives for SH and in the Axes –, we analyze the dynamics related to the spatialization of real estate releases between 2008 and 2019, for the economic segment, the characteristics of these properties in the analyzed subspaces of the Axes, Center and East Zone (price, size, units, utilization coefficient, etc.) and the developers that benefited from the incentives. Cartographies and analyzes show that, despite incentives, this does not happen in the axes, areas better offered by public transport, and when it does, it produces tiny and expensive units. The Axes seem to follow the same logic of social homogenization of higher income families. Production distances itself from the desired socio-spatial inclusion and is even more involved in the mechanisms of financial-real estate accumulation, in the logic of housing as a real estate-financialized asset.
Stroher et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: