What type of study is this?

This is a Quantitative Study study.

October 23, 2025Energies2 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Potential of Organic Waste Methane for Implementation in Energy Self-Sufficient Wastewater Treatment Facilities

PMPawel MarczewskiPoznań University of Technology KSKatarzyna Sytek-SzmeichelWarsaw University of Technology MŻMonika Żubrowska-SudołWarsaw University of Technology

Puntos clave

Methane production reached up to 1387 NmL CH4/g VS from wine tank sediment, significantly higher than conventional sludge.
Techno-economic analysis indicates a net-positive energy balance of up to 170% for optimal substrates in large wastewater treatment plants.
Co-digestion with organic substrates like yeast slurry and herbal waste improves methane yields and energy efficiency.
Findings highlight the need for strategic substrate selection to achieve energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment facilities.

Resumen

The water sector faces a dual challenge: reducing energy consumption and carbon footprint while improving wastewater treatment efficiency. Anaerobic digestion (AD) remains the primary method for energy recovery in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). To enhance methane production and move toward carbon neutrality, co-digestion of sewage sludge with external substrates is gaining attention. This study evaluated nine organic substrates for their methane potential using the standardized Automatic Methane Potential Test System (AMPTS). The highest methane yield was obtained from sediment from a wine tank, reaching 1387 NmL CH4/g VS, followed by yeast slurry, with 524 NmL CH4/g VS. These values were over 6 and 2.5 times higher, respectively, compared to the methane potential of conventional mixed municipal sludge. Apple pomace, whey, food biowaste, and herbal maceration waste showed moderate improvements (301–388 NmL CH4/gVS). When considering methane yield per gram of wet substrate, herbal maceration waste was the most efficient. A techno-economic analysis revealed that this substrate consistently achieved a net-positive energy balance (up to 170%) in large WWTPs, even at transport distances of 50 km. Other substrates also showed high potential, covering nearly 100% of energy demand under optimal conditions. In contrast, whey showed limited applicability due to transport constraints. These findings highlight the importance of substrate selection, particularly in practical efforts aimed at achieving energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment plants. It also provides WWTP operators with clear and practical insights into enhancing methane yields from anaerobic digesters while minimizing the risk of process inhibition.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo