Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have revolutionized malaria diagnosis, playing a crucial role in improving timely treatment and supporting surveillance efforts, especially in resource-limited settings. However, the performance of RDTs can vary widely due to factors such as parasite genetic diversity, environmental conditions, and operational challenges. Understanding these variations is essential to ensuring accurate and reliable malaria diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluate the diagnostic performance of malaria RDTs across sub-Saharan Africa, identifying key gaps and proposing strategies for developing novel tests. By pooling data from 48 studies, the analysis quantifies the sensitivity and specificity of various RDT brands in different settings. The results reveal considerable variability, influenced by factors such as antigen persistence, cross-reactivity with other infections, and genetic polymorphism in the HRP2 gene, which can lead to false positives and negatives. The findings underscore the need for region-specific diagnostic strategies and the development of advanced diagnostic tools capable of detecting low-level parasitemia and differentiating between Plasmodium species. Emerging technologies and multi-platform approaches are recommended to enhance the accuracy and reliability of malaria diagnosis, ultimately contributing to more effective malaria control and elimination efforts in sub-Saharan Africa.
Ojeniyi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.