Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Substituting chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers is a significant agricultural practice that can enhance crop yield while influencing soil activity. To investigate the effects of biochar-based organic fertilizer on rice yield, quality, and soil physicochemical properties and activity, this study conducted a field experiment with three treatments: chemical fertilizer only (CK), 30% of chemical nitrogen substituted with conventional organic fertilizer (CF), and 30% of chemical nitrogen substituted with biochar-based organic fertilizer (BF). Compared with chemical fertilizer alone (CK), both CF and BF treatments significantly increased rice yield by 8.9% and 14.2%, respectively, with BF showing a further increase over CF, primarily attributed to an 18.7% increase in panicle number. Both organic fertilizer treatments significantly improved grain quality, reducing amylose content by 4.6% and 13.1%, and increasing taste value by 3.3% and 3.6%, respectively. Dry matter accumulation throughout the growth period was significantly enhanced, with BF increasing total dry weight by 11.2% at maturity compared to CK. Root morphology was markedly improved, with BF increasing root volume by 146.1% at the grain-filling stage. Soil nutrient content was significantly elevated, showing maximum increases under BF of 118.9% for alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, 51.7% for ammonium nitrogen, 30.6% for available phosphorus, and 177.6% for available potassium. Soil enzyme activity analysis revealed significant enhancements in urease, acid phosphatase, and sucrase activities, with maximum increases of 91.5%, 105.6%, and 104.2%, respectively, under BF. These findings demonstrate that organic fertilizers, particularly biochar-based organic fertilizer, can synergistically enhance rice yield and quality by promoting root growth, strengthening soil microbial activity and enzymatic reactions, and optimizing nutrient supply. Biochar-based organic fertilizer exhibits significant advantages in improving soil biological fertility and maintaining stable nutrient supply during the late growth stages of rice.
Ding et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: