PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2026Therapeutic Advances in Hematology3 citationsOpen Access

Clinical practice of the endothelial activation and stress index and its modified versions in multiple myeloma and the effects on prognosis

View Full Paper
VGVildan GürsoyÖGÖzgür Ömer GülEKElif Köse

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the prognostic value of EASIX measures in multiple myeloma patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 134 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients
  • Grouping by EASIX and its derivatives
  • Determination of optimal cut-off points using receiver-operating characteristic analysis
  • Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for prognostic factors.
  • EASIX optimal cut-off point >1.03 associated with shorter survival times (p < 0.001)
  • mEASIX optimal cut-off point >26.5 showed higher specificity (AUC = 0.663; p = 0.003)
  • High EASIX scores identified as independent negative prognostic factors for survival.

Abstract

Objective: Here, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic values of the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and its derivatives, modified EASIX (mEASIX) and simplified EASIX (sEASIX), in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: The data of 134 newly diagnosed MM patients between January 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into groups based on EASIX and its derivatives, and the outcomes of survival rates in groups were compared. Optimal cut-off points were determined using the receiver-operating characteristic analysis, and mortality predictive values of the scores were investigated. The independent prognostic factors were evaluated through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results: The optimal cut-off point for EASIX was detected as >1.03, and survival times were significantly shorter in patients with higher EASIX scores ( p 26.5, showing higher specificity (area under curve (AUC) = 0.663; p = 0.003). The sEASIX score predicted lower mortality (AUC = 0.586; p = 0.123). In multivariate analysis, high EASIX scores, not performing autologous stem cell transplantation, and not receiving immunomodulatory therapy were identified as independent negative prognostic factors for survival. Conclusion: EASIX, especially mEASIX, is a valuable prognostic tool for predicting survival in MM patients. EASIX can be easily integrated into clinical practice due to its simple computability and reliance on commonly used laboratory parameters. However, larger prospective studies are needed to determine how these scores can be integrated with traditional prognostic systems such as the International Staging System (ISS) and Revised-ISS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gürsoy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d854b3483e917927a475ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/20406207251387409
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper