Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract We study the staggered introduction of a generative AI–based conversational assistant using data from 5,172 customer-support agents. Access to AI assistance increases worker productivity, as measured by issues resolved per hour, by 15% on average, with substantial heterogeneity across workers. The effects vary significantly across different agents. Less experienced and lower-skilled workers improve both the speed and quality of their output, while the most experienced and highest-skilled workers see small gains in speed and small declines in quality. We also find evidence that AI assistance facilitates worker learning and improves English fluency, particularly among international agents. While AI systems improve with more training data, we find that the gains from AI adoption are largest for moderately rare problems, where human agents have less baseline experience but the system still has adequate training data. Finally, we provide evidence that AI assistance improves the experience of work along several dimensions: customers are more polite and less likely to ask to speak to a manager.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Erik Brynjolfsson
National Bureau of Economic Research
Danielle Li
National Bureau of Economic Research
Lindsey Raymond
Moffitt Cancer Center
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Stanford University
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
National Bureau of Economic Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brynjolfsson et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/695ebd31aadeeba2e98b14db — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: