Pulse Explorar nav.journalClub Debates Tendencias Investigadores Revistas

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

Inicio Explorar nav.journalClub Tendencias

⌘+K

December 3, 2024Open Access

Ver artículo completo

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals

ZLZhiqiang LiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine HXHuilin XuFudan University HCHuijuan CaoSun Yat-sen University

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

This cross-sectional study of 100 top medical journals examines policies for use of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI in peer review.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Li et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6962852874149119c81f8bb7 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off2023 · 73 citations
2Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis2024 · 215 citations
3AI and science: what 1,600 researchers think2023 · 357 citations
4Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis2024 · 176 citations
5Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots2023 · 132 citations

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals | Synapse