What question did this study set out to answer?

To assess the impact of BCID2-negative Gram-Negative Rod bacteremia on time to effective antimicrobial therapy.

January 14, 2026Open Access

P-1678. Gram-Negative Rod Bacteremia due to Organisms not Detected on the BioFire® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel: Time to Effective Antimicrobial Therapy

Puntos clave

To assess the impact of BCID2-negative Gram-Negative Rod bacteremia on time to effective antimicrobial therapy.
Evaluated 135 patients with BCID2-negative GNR bacteremia from July 2020 to August 2024.
Analyzed distribution of BCID-2 negative GNR pathogens.
Compared clinical outcomes between aerobic and anaerobic cases using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests.
24% of patients lacked effective therapy 12 hours after a negative BCID2 result.
Median time to effective therapy for aerobes was 47 hours compared to 27 hours for anaerobes.
A 7-day increase in hospital length of stay was seen among anaerobes, particularly Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Fusobacterium spp.

Resumen

Abstract Background The BioFire® BCID2 panel has revolutionized rapid diagnostics, reducing time to organism identification and targeted therapy. Despite detectability of 16 additional organisms and resistance genes compared to the original panel, limited data exists regarding the clinical impact of BCID-2 negative Gram-Negative Rod (GNR) bacteremia cases. Methods We evaluated the effect of BCID2-negative GNR bacteremia on time to effective therapy (TTET). Overall, 135 patients had BCID2-negative GNR bacteremia from July 2020 to August 2024. Further analysis examined the distribution of BCID-2 negative GNR pathogens and compared clinical outcomes between aerobic and anaerobic cases. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used to compare health outcomes. P-values were statistically significant if they were less than a pre-specified alpha level of 0.05. Results At 12 hours post-BCID2 result, 24% (32/135) of patients lacked effective therapy. This group consisted of 15 aerobes and 17 anaerobes, with a median (interquartile range) TTET of 41 (20-51) hours. A 20-hour increase in median TTET was observed in the aerobic group vs. the anaerobic group: 47 (39-59) vs. 27 (18-42), p=0.02. Aerobes not on effective therapy were led by Pseudomonas putida (13%), Achromobacter spp. (13%), Brucella anthropi (13%), and Myroides spp. (13%). Despite these findings, a 7-day increase in median hospital length of stay (LOS) was observed among anaerobes: (17 (10-34) vs. 10 (7-19) days, p=0.01), with Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (n=23) and Fusobacterium spp. (n=27) accounting for 60% (50/83) of the anaerobic pathogens. Conclusion These findings indicate that nearly 1 in 4 patients lacked effective therapy 12 hours after a negative BCID2 result. Over half of these cases involved anaerobic pathogens, particularly Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Fusobacterium spp., which were associated with a prolonged hospital LOS. Disclosures Christopher R. Frei, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS, Amgen: Grant/Research Support|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo