Enhancing Wind Farm Siting with the Combined Use of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal location for siting an onshore wind farm on the island of Skyros, thereby maximizing performance and minimizing the project’s environmental impacts. Seven evaluation criteria are defined across various sectors, including environmental and economic sectors, and six criteria weighting methods are applied in combination with four multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) ranking methods for suitable areas, resulting in twenty-four ranking models. The alternatives considered in the analysis were defined through the application of constraints imposed by the Specific Framework for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development for Renewable Energy Sources (SFSPSD RES), complemented by exclusion criteria documented in the international literature, as well as a minimum area requirement ensuring the feasibility of installing at least four wind turbines within the study area. The correlations between their results are then assessed using the Spearman coefficient. Geographic information systems (GISs) are utilized as a mapping tool. Through the application of the methodology, it emerges that area A9, located in the central to northern part of Skyros, is consistently assessed as the most suitable site for the installation of a wind farm based on nine models combining criteria weighting and MCDM methods, which should be prioritized as an option for early-stage wind farm siting planning. The results demonstrate an absolute correlation among the subjective weighting methods, whereas the objective methods do not appear to be significantly correlated with each other or with the subjective methods. The ranking methods with the highest correlation are PROMETHEE II and ELECTRE III, while those with the lowest are TOPSIS and VIKOR. Additionally, the hierarchy shows consistency across results using weights from AHP, BWM, ROC, and SIMOS. After applying multiple methods to investigate correlations and mitigate their disadvantages, it is concluded that when experts in the field are involved, it is preferable to incorporate subjective multicriteria analysis methods into decision-making problems. Finally, it is recommended to use more than one MCDM method in order to reach sound decisions.