Cardiovascular imaging is essential for detecting and managing cardiac risks in nearly 20 million cancer patients undergoing advanced therapies.
This AHA scientific statement provides consensus guidance on the optimal application of multimodality cardiovascular imaging for the detection, monitoring, and management of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving contemporary cancer therapies.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 0% vs 0%
Advances in cancer therapeutics have led to dramatic improvements in survival, now inclusive of nearly 20 million patients and rising. However, cardiovascular toxicities associated with specific cancer therapeutics adversely affect the outcomes of patients with cancer. Advances in cardiovascular imaging have solidified the critical role for robust methods for detecting, monitoring, and prognosticating cardiac risk among patients with cancer. However, decentralized evaluations have led to a lack of consensus on the optimal uses of imaging in contemporary cancer treatment (eg, immunotherapy, targeted, or biological therapy) settings. Similarly, available isolated preclinical and clinical studies have provided incomplete insights into the effectiveness of multiple modalities for cardiovascular imaging in cancer care. The aims of this scientific statement are to define the current state of evidence for cardiovascular imaging in the cancer treatment and survivorship settings and to propose novel methodological approaches to inform the optimal application of cardiovascular imaging in future clinical trials and registries. We also propose an evidence-based integrated approach to the use of cardiovascular imaging in routine clinical settings. This scientific statement summarizes and clarifies available evidence while providing guidance on the optimal uses of multimodality cardiovascular imaging in the era of emerging anticancer therapies.
Addison et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Cardiovascular imaging is essential for detecting and managing cardiac risks in nearly 20 million cancer patients undergoing advanced therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: