According to existing procedures for defining the velocity distribution across cross profile sections of watercourses (e.g., Entropy theory and Power Law theory), surface velocity is a key input parameter, together with cross-sectional bathymetry. Field measurements to obtain velocity values and their distributions are often difficult due to limited equipment, unreliable data, missing data, or hazardous conditions such as flooding and inaccessible locations. This creates a strong need for alternative approaches to measuring surface velocities in rivers. The application of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), mobile phones, and traditional field instruments such as the Propeller Current Meter (PCM) can significantly improve measurement efficiency, especially in situations where conventional methods are not feasible. This paper presents an algorithm for comparing these measurement approaches and quantifying their differences. The methodology is demonstrated using a real case study on the Bednja River in Croatia, which flows through alluvial deposits. The results show that video-based surface velocity estimation using UAV and mobile phone imagery is feasible under real river conditions. Still, its accuracy depends strongly on flow conditions and surface characteristics. While UAV recordings provide reliable results in fast and turbulent flows, mobile phone videos yield more stable performance in smoother flow conditions, where additional surface texture is available from natural tracers.
Šamanović et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: