What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the effectiveness of expanded endoscopic endonasal (EEA) versus transcranial approach (TCA) in managing giant craniopharyngiomas.

January 25, 2026

Surgical management of giant craniopharyngiomas: expanded endoscopic endonasal or transcranial approach?

Puntos clave

To evaluate the effectiveness of expanded endoscopic endonasal (EEA) versus transcranial approach (TCA) in managing giant craniopharyngiomas.
Compared surgical outcomes of EEA and TCA for giant craniopharyngiomas
Assessed gross-total resection rates
Evaluated visual and hypothalamic/endocrinological improvement
Monitored for postoperative complications such as CSF leaks
EEA achieved a similar gross-total resection rate compared to TCA
Patients showed greater improvement in vision after EEA
EEA resulted in better hypothalamic and endocrinological function
EEA had a higher risk of postoperative CSF leaks, though not statistically significant

Resumen

Expanded EEA is associated with a similar gross-total resection rate, greater visual improvement, and better hypothalamic and endocrinological function compared with traditional TCA. Although not statistically significant, EEA was associated with a higher risk for postoperative CSF leaks. These data favor the view that EEA is a safe and effective surgical modality, providing a viable alternative to TCA for GCPs.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar