The Netherlands is widely recognised as the global leader in water management, with its flood risk management (FRM) infrastructure lauded as being of the best in the world. This status notwithstanding, Dutch FRM primarily maintains established infrastructural practices and experimental applications of NBSs remain less frequent than established structural projects. This paper details and examines the challenges associated with the prevailing ‘business-as-usual’ approach to FRM in the Netherlands, in which traditional ‘grey’ infrastructural techniques are prioritised over innovative ‘green’ nature-based solutions (NBSs). In line with emerging international trends, such as the EU Water Resilience Strategy, NBSs are increasingly advocated as a strategic, complementary layer to enhance the resilience of existing safety frameworks rather than a self-evident replacement for them. Contrary to grey infrastructure, NBSs provide a number of environmental and social co-benefits extending beyond their flood and drought protection utility. The literature on NBSs details the design, effectiveness, and positive socio-economic impact of the operationalisation of such projects for FRM. This notwithstanding, the uptake and practical implementation of NBSs have been slow in the Netherlands. From a legal and policy perspective, this has been attributed to a lack of political will and the corresponding failure to include NBSs in long term FRM planning. Given the long planning horizons associated with FRM (50–100 years), the failure to incorporate NBSs can lead to policy lock-in that blocks future adaptations. Against this backdrop, this paper employs a semi-systematic literature review to clarify the obstacles to implementing NBSs in Dutch FRM and sets a research agenda that charts a course to mainstreaming NBSs in Dutch FRM. Seven core focus areas for future research are identified. The paper concludes by drawing on these identified focus areas to construct a research agenda aimed at systematically addressing each barrier to the practical operationalisation of NBSs in Dutch FRM, emphasising a hybrid green–grey approach which may serve to inspire similar research in other jurisdictions.
Harvey et al. (Thu,) studied this question.