Balancing convergence accuracy and population diversity remains a fundamental challenge in multi-objective optimization, particularly for complex and constrained engineering problems. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel Multi-Objective Crested Porcupine Optimizer (MOCPO), inspired by the hierarchical defensive behaviors of crested porcupines. The proposed algorithm integrates four biologically motivated defense strategies—vision, hearing, scent diffusion, and physical attack—into a unified optimization framework, where global exploration and local exploitation are dynamically coordinated. To effectively extend the original optimizer to multi-objective scenarios, MOCPO incorporates a reference-point guided external archiving mechanism to preserve a well-distributed set of non-dominated solutions, along with an environmental selection strategy that adaptively partitions the objective space and enhances solution quality. Furthermore, a multi-level leadership mechanism based on Euclidean distance is introduced to provide region-specific guidance, enabling precise and uniform coverage of the Pareto front. The performance of MOCPO is comprehensively evaluated on 18 benchmark problems from the WFG and CF test suites. Experimental results demonstrate that MOCPO consistently outperforms several state-of-the-art multi-objective algorithms, including MOPSO and NSGA-III, in terms of IGD, GD, HV, and Spread metrics, achieving the best overall ranking in Friedman statistical tests. Notably, the proposed algorithm exhibits strong robustness on discontinuous, multimodal, and constrained Pareto fronts. In addition, MOCPO is applied to UAV path planning in four complex terrain scenarios constructed from real digital elevation data. The results show that MOCPO generates shorter, smoother, and more stable flight paths while effectively balancing route length, threat avoidance, flight altitude, and trajectory smoothness. These findings confirm the effectiveness, robustness, and practical applicability of MOCPO for solving complex real-world multi-objective optimization problems.
Shi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.