Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Among the many traditions of research on two somewhat different yet strongly related strands of theory have developed. The first, reflected in the work of Stryker and colleagues, focuses on the linkages of social structures with identities. The second, reflected in the work of Burke and colleagues, focuses on the internal process of self-verification. In the present paper we review each of these strands and then discuss ways in which the two relate to and complement one another Each provides a context for the other: the relation of social structures to identities influences the process of self-verification, while the process of self-verification creates and sustains social structures. The paper concludes with examples of potentially useful applications of theory to other arenas of social psychology, and with a discussion of challenges that theory must meet to provide a clear understanding of the relation between self and society. The language of identity is ubiquitous in contemporary social science, cutting across psychoanalysis, psychology, political science, sociology, and history. The common usage of the term identity, however, belies the considerable variability in both its conceptual meanings and its theoretical role. Even when consideration is restricted to sociology and social psychology, variation is still considerable.'
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sheldon Stryker
University of California, Riverside
Peter J. Burke
University of California, Riverside
Social Psychology Quarterly
Indiana University Bloomington
Washington State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stryker et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/697bfaadba68fb39079bf375 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: