APOE4 homozygotes had greater WMH volumes and were more likely to be Aβ-positive than non-carriers, but WMH did not mediate this association.
Does white matter hyperintensity burden mediate the association between APOE4 homozygosity and amyloid-PET Aβ deposition in cognitively normal individuals?
In cognitively normal individuals, white matter hyperintensity burden does not mediate the increased risk of amyloid-beta deposition associated with APOE4 homozygosity.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 0% vs 0%
Introduction: Emerging evidence highlights the increased white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden in APOE4 homozygotes, the greatest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). The link between WMH and cerebral amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation remains unclear, especially in presymptomatic AD phases. We aimed to determine whether WMH burden (global or regional) mediates the association between APOE4 homozygosity and amyloid-PET Aβ deposition in a population of subjects with intact cognition. Methods: WMH were segmented using a deep learning model applied to T1 and T2-FLAIR MRI scans from 49 cognitively intact individuals older than 50. The global and regional (periventricular, lobar, basal ganglia, infratentorial) WMH volumes were adjusted for total intracranial volume and log-transformed to normalize distribution. Amyloid-PET cerebral Aβ burden was quantified in centiloid units; individuals with centiloid > 20 were classified as Aβ-positive. To examine our mediation hypothesis, we tested three pathways using logistic and linear regression models: 1) Path a, the association between APOE4 and global or regional WMH volumes (outcome); 2) Path b, the association between WMH volumes and Aβ positivity (outcome); 3) Path c (total) and c' (direct) effects of APOE4on Aβ positivity (outcome), before and after adjusting for WMH volumes. All models incorporated age and vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoking). Results: We included 11 APOE4 homozygotes, of whom 7 were Aβ-positive and 38 non-carriers (35 3/3 and 3 3/2) (6 Aβ-positive). Compared to APOE4 non-carriers, APOE4 homozygotes had significantly greater WMH volumes in the posterior periventricular region only (p= 0.0453) (path a). Homozygotes were significantly more likely to be Aβ-positive compared to non-carriers (total effect, path c p=0.0019). This association remained significant after adjusting for WMH (direct effect, path c'= 0.0027). However, neither global (p=0.72) nor posterior periventricular (p=0.84) WMH volumes predicted Aβ positivity (path b) (Figure). Conclusions: In our cohort of cognitively normal individuals including preclinical AD, neither global nor regional WMH burden mediated the relationship between APOE4 homozygosity and Aβ positivity. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate the mechanistic relationship between WMH and neurodegeneration in APOE4 carriers.
Kadambi et al. (Thu,) reported a other. APOE4 homozygotes had greater WMH volumes and were more likely to be Aβ-positive than non-carriers, but WMH did not mediate this association.