Digital health tools improved physical activity by 26%-167% among stroke and TIA survivors, but showed limited evidence for weight reduction.
Do digital health tools and wearable technologies improve physical activity and weight outcomes in stroke or TIA survivors?
Digital health tools and wearables can improve physical activity in stroke and TIA survivors, but their impact on weight reduction remains limited.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 0% vs 0%
Introduction: Digital health interventions might help improve modifiable vascular risk factors such as physical activity and weight. However, their effectiveness in improving health behavior and secondary prevention after stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remain uncertain. We systematically reviewed studies assessing the impact of digital health tools or devices on physical activity and body weight outcomes in this population. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (inception–Feb 2025) using terms related to stroke, TIA, secondary prevention, and digital health tools or devices. Studies reporting physical activity, weight or body mass index (BMI) outcomes after stroke or TIA were included. A meta-analysis was planned if ≥3 studies reported the same outcome with comparable measures; where possible, weighted demographics were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and ROBIN-1 for non-randomized studies. Results: Seven studies reported on physical activity (n=551 total; intervention N=351, mean age=59 years, 35% female; control N=200, mean age=59 years, 33% female) and 6 weight management studies (n=511 total; intervention N=325, mean age=44 years, 40% female; control N=186, mean age=43 years, 38.2% female). Interventions included using mobile apps and wearable activity trackers for self-monitoring with goal setting and sometimes tele-coaching. Five studies that reported on physical activity demonstrated 26%-167% increases in steps/day, active minutes, or self-reported activity versus baseline or control (Figure 1). With regards to weight management studies, reported effects were mixed; Four short-duration studies showed minimal or no change, while two observed modest weight loss (Figure 2). Risk of bias assessment found most RCTs to be at low-moderate risk (physical activity: 4/5; weight: 4/4), with one study rated high risk of bias. All non-randomized studies were at serious risk of bias. There was heterogeneity in intervention content, outcome measures, and follow-up that precluded meta-analysis for most outcomes. So we present descriptive pooled summaries of relative improvements. Conclusions: Digital health tools and devices can improve physical activity among stroke and TIA survivors, but evidence for weight reduction is limited. Future research should address longer follow-up, standardized outcome reporting, and diverse populations to clarify generalizability and sustained benefits.
Tavakoli et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Digital health tools improved physical activity by 26%-167% among stroke and TIA survivors, but showed limited evidence for weight reduction.