ABSTRACT Replication is essential to reliable and consistent scientific discovery in high‐throughput experiments. Quantifying the replicability of scientific discoveries and identifying sources of irreproducibility have become important tasks for quality control and data integration. In this work we introduce a novel statistical model to measure the reproducibility and replicability of findings from replicate experiments in multi‐source studies. Using a nested copula mixture model that characterizes the interdependence between replication experiments both across and within sources, our method quantifies reproducibility and replicability of each candidate simultaneously in a coherent framework. Through simulation studies, an ENCODE ChIP‐seq dataset and a SEQC RNA‐seq dataset, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in diagnosing the source of discordance and improving the reliability of scientific discoveries.
Ranalli et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: