This paper develops the collapse‑native stabilization framework that underlies feasibility anchoring and logic reconstitution within the MID/QC architecture. Classical models treat collapse as failure or breakdown; MID/QC reframes collapse as a geometric stabilization mechanism that restores coherence, reconstitutes logical structure, and anchors feasible system trajectories. The work formalizes collapse‑native geometry, coherence‑preserving contraction, threshold‑driven stabilization, and the reconstitution of logical pathways within tension‑gradient architecture. It introduces feasibility anchoring as a substrate‑native process in which collapse dynamics prune unstable modes, reinforce viable configurations, and restore coherence‑consistent logic. This paper establishes the geometric and logical foundations for collapse‑driven stabilization across physical, computational, and organizational systems, extending the MID/QC framework into feasibility theory and coherence‑aligned decision architecture.
Chadwick Rasque (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: