A predictive tool for coronary artery calcification progression demonstrated 80.1% explained variance, with a sensitivity of 59.5% and specificity of 96.1% in a cohort study.
Can a mathematical tool based on baseline coronary artery calcification accurately predict individual CAC progression over 5 years?
Coronary artery calcification progression over 5 years is highly predictable using baseline CAC percentiles, with traditional cardiovascular risk factors having only a limited additional influence.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 0% vs 0%
Abstract Aim Coronary artery calcification (CAC), as a sign of atherosclerosis, can be detected and progression quantified using computed tomography (CT). We develop a tool for predicting CAC progression. Methods and results In 3481 participants (45–74 years, 53.1% women) CAC percentiles at baseline (CACb) and after five years (CAC5y) were evaluated, demonstrating progression along gender-specific percentiles, which showed exponentially shaped age-dependence. Using quantile regression on the log-scale (log(CACb+1)) we developed a tool to individually predict CAC5y, and compared to observed CAC5y. The difference between observed and predicted CAC5y (log-scale, mean±SD) was 0.08±1.11 and 0.06±1.29 in men and women. Agreement reached a kappa-value of 0.746 (95% confidence interval: 0.732–0.760) and concordance correlation (log-scale) of 0.886 (0.879–0.893). Explained variance of observed by predicted log(CAC5y+1) was 80.1% and 72.0% in men and women, and 81.0 and 73.6% including baseline risk factors. Evaluating the tool in 1940 individuals with CACb0 and CACb400 at baseline, of whom 242 (12.5%) developed CAC5y400, yielded a sensitivity of 59.5%, specificity 96.1%, (+) and (−) predictive values of 68.3% and 94.3%. A pre-defined acceptance range around predicted CAC5y contained 68.1% of observed CAC5y; only 20% were expected by chance. Age, blood pressure, lipid-lowering medication, diabetes, and smoking contributed to progression above the acceptance range in men and, excepting age, in women. Conclusion CAC nearly inevitably progresses with limited influence of cardiovascular risk factors. This allowed the development of a mathematical tool for prediction of individual CAC progression, enabling anticipation of the age when CAC thresholds of high risk are reached.
Erbel et al. (Fri,) reported a other. A predictive tool for coronary artery calcification progression demonstrated 80.1% explained variance, with a sensitivity of 59.5% and specificity of 96.1% in a cohort study.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: