Background/Objectives: Bulk-fill (BF) resin-based composites (RBCs) have become increasingly popular due to their efficient placement. However, there is a lack of comprehensive performance comparisons among commercially available BF RBCs. In standardized curing conditions, this study aimed to compare the mechanical performance, water sorption and solubility, surface roughness, and color stability of commercially available BF RBCs with different consistencies (flowable and packable). Methods: Ten BF RBCs, along with a conventional RBC (control), were evaluated. Flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured using a three-point bending test. Water sorption and solubility were assessed after 28-day water storage. Color (ΔE00) and surface roughness (ΔRa) changes were measured after 28-day immersion in water, Pepsi, or coffee. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests analyzed the data. Results: 3M Flow, Shofu Bulk, and Ivoclar Flow revealed lower strength (p < 0.001) compared to 3M Bulk (132.17 ± 12.54 MPa) and the control (124.56 ± 15.60 MPa). Shofu Bulk (24.68 ± 12.55 µg/mm3) and Ivoclar Flow (27.11 ± 6.27 µg/mm3) were the least affected by water sorption. While Shofu Bulk (13.98 ± 11.39 µg/mm3), Ivoclar Flow (20.28 ± 6.64 µg/mm3), and SDR (20.84 ± 9.74 µg/mm3) exhibited the lowest solubility (p < 0.01). After water and Pepsi immersion, FGM Bulk showed a significant color change compared to 3M Bulk and Ivoclar Bulk (p < 0.05). Following coffee immersion, Shofu Bulk (17.38 ± 1.82) revealed significant color changes (p < 0.001). Increased surface roughness was observed in 3M Bulk and Ivoclar Bulk after water immersion, Shofu Bulk after Pepsi immersion, and FGM Bulk after coffee immersion. Conclusions: BF RBCs exhibit notable variability in their intrinsic properties. 3M Bulk and Control showed the highest strength, while Shofu Bulk had significant color changes.
Almulhim et al. (Sat,) studied this question.