This paper presents a novel interpretation of Zeno's Achilles paradox through direct textual analysis of Aristotle's Physics (239b14–18). We argue that the paradox's recursive logic reveals a structure of 'displaced presence' whereby sequential exclusivity prevents spatiotemporal co-occupation. Unlike interpretations that import modern mathematical concepts foreign to 5th century BCE thought, our reading requires only concepts demonstrably available to ancient Greeks: exclusive spatial occupation, temporal sequence, and observable pursuit dynamics. We make no claims about Zeno's intentions but analyse what the paradox's logic necessarily implies. A new line of evidence is introduced: Aristotle's own chain of definitions in Physics V.3 (226b34–227a17), distinguishing successive (ἐφεξῆς), contiguous (ἐχόμενον), and continuous (συνεχές) relations, formally describes the very structure the Achilles paradox exploits, a relation locked in succession that can never become contiguity. This approach opens philosophical inquiry rather than dissolving the paradox through anachronistic frameworks. (Version 3.0)
Moreno Nourizadeh (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: